Metabolomics Creative Proteomics
Submit Your Inquiry

Glycosaminoglycan (GAG) Profiling and LC–MS/MS Analysis Service

Subtle changes in glycosaminoglycans (GAGs) – HS, CS, DS, KS and HA – can reshape the ECM, glycocalyx and disease phenotypes, but are hard to quantify. Our dedicated GAG analysis and LC–MS/MS profiling service turns this complexity into clear, decision-ready data for your oncology, vascular and cartilage studies.

Key advantages

  • GAG-focused panels for HS, CS, DS, KS and HA disaccharides, optimized for LC–MS/MS.
  • Validated quantitation with triple quadrupole platforms and strict QC for consistent results.
  • Broad sample compatibility including plasma/serum, tissues, cell pellets, organoids and ECM materials.
  • Integrative readouts that link GAG profiles with metabolomics data and biological endpoints.
CONTACT EXPERT
  • Service Details
  • FAQ
  • Publications
  • Submit Your Inquiry

What Is GAG Analysis and LC–MS/MS Profiling?

Glycosaminoglycans (GAGs) – including heparan sulfate (HS)/heparin (HP), chondroitin sulfate (CS), dermatan sulfate (DS), keratan sulfate (KS), and hyaluronan (HA) – are key components of the extracellular matrix and cell surface glycocalyx. Their chain length, sulfation pattern, and degradation dynamics are tightly linked to:

  • Cell signaling and growth factor binding
  • Tumor and immune microenvironment remodeling
  • Vascular/endothelial glycocalyx integrity
  • Cartilage and intervertebral disc degeneration
  • Metabolic and rare disease mechanisms

Our GAG profiling and LC–MS/MS analysis service characterizes GAGs at multiple levels: overall content, class-specific composition, disaccharide patterns, and structural remodeling under different experimental conditions. The service is designed for basic and translational research, and can be seamlessly integrated with broader metabolomics studies.

GAG Analysis Services We Provide

Quantitative GAG profiling

  • Total and class-specific levels of HS/HP, CS, DS, KS and HA
  • Relative or absolute quantification where suitable standards are available

Disaccharide and sulfation-pattern profiling

  • Enzymatic depolymerization of GAG chains to defined disaccharides
  • LC–MS/MS measurement of non-sulfated and sulfated disaccharides to reveal composition and remodeling

Focused HS / CS structural profiling

  • Higher-resolution disaccharide panels for HS and CS/DS
  • Detection of changes in key N- and O-sulfation motifs relevant to signaling and microenvironment studies

Integration with metabolomics and other omics

  • Optional combination with global or targeted metabolomics
  • Pathway-level interpretation of GAG metabolism, ECM–receptor interaction and related metabolic networks

Analytical Coverage: GAG Types and Disaccharide Panels

GAG Classes and LC–MS/MS Coverage

GAG class Abbreviation Typical research focus
Heparan sulfate / Heparin HS / HP Tumor and immune microenvironment, endothelial glycocalyx, signaling studies
Chondroitin sulfate CS Cartilage and intervertebral disc biology, ECM remodeling
Dermatan sulfate DS Connective tissue, skin and vascular ECM research
Keratan sulfate KS Cartilage and disc homeostasis and degeneration models
Hyaluronan (Hyaluronic acid) HA Biofluids, ECM extracts, tissue engineering and biomaterials

Disaccharide Panel Options

Panel type / level Typical disaccharides included Typical research focus
Non-sulfated disaccharides HA-derived and non-sulfated HS/CS/DS disaccharides Baseline GAG content; comparison of overall chain abundance
Mono-sulfated disaccharides 4-O-, 6-O-, 2-O- and N-sulfated HS/CS/DS disaccharides (depending on standards) Detection of subtle changes in sulfation motifs under different conditions
Di- and multi-sulfated species Selected di- and multi-sulfated HS/CS/DS disaccharides Studies of highly sulfated regions linked to growth factor and chemokine binding
HS-focused disaccharide panel HS/HP disaccharides with distinct N- and O-sulfation motifs HS/HP remodeling in tumor microenvironment, glycocalyx and signaling pathways
CS/DS/KS-focused panel CS, DS and KS disaccharides relevant to cartilage, disc and ECM biology Cartilage degeneration, disc disease, tissue engineering and ECM quality assessment
Broad multi-GAG panel Combined HS/HP + CS/DS + KS + HA disaccharides Plasma/serum/urine and multi-tissue profiling in systemic or longitudinal studies

Why Choose Our GAG Analysis Services?

  • Specialized in GAGs and ECM biology
    Our methods and reporting are built around real projects in oncology, vascular biology, cartilage/disc research and functional polysaccharides – not generic, one-size-fits-all metabolomics.
  • High information per run
    Multi-class panels (HS/HP, CS/DS, KS, HA) and broad disaccharide coverage in a single LC–MS/MS workflow help reduce batch effects and keep per-sample costs under control.
  • Efficient with precious samples
    The workflow works with small volumes and diverse matrices, including plasma/serum, tissues, cell pellets, organoids, ECM extracts and biomaterials.
  • Robust QC and easy-to-use results
    Internal standards, pooled QCs and controlled batch design support reproducible quantitation, while standardized tables and clear visual summaries make downstream analysis and reporting straightforward.

Platform and Analytical Methods for GAG Analysis

Our GAG assays are built on mainstream LC–MS platforms widely used in metabolomics and glycomics, with settings optimized for disaccharide sensitivity and reproducibility.

UHPLC separation

  • Systems: high-performance UHPLC (e.g., Agilent 1290)
  • Columns: 2.1 × 100–150 mm, 1.7–2.6 μm amide or C18 columns for GAG disaccharides
  • Typical run time: ~20–30 min per sample, optimized for baseline separation of key GAG species

Targeted LC–MS/MS quantification

  • Mass spectrometers: triple quadrupole instruments (e.g., Agilent 6495C)
  • Ionization & mode: ESI negative, MRM transitions for each disaccharide
  • Performance: linear dynamic range ≥ 3–4 orders of magnitude; typical intra-batch CVs < 15% for qualified peaks

High-resolution LC–MS for structural confirmation (on demand)

  • Platforms: Orbitrap-type MS (e.g., Q Exactive class) for selected samples
  • Use: full-scan and MS/MS to confirm disaccharide identities and complex sulfation motifs when required

Built-in QC and stability control

  • Stable or structural analog internal standards where available
  • Pooled QC injections throughout the batch to monitor retention time, signal stability and system performance
Agilent 1260 Infinity II HPLC

Agilent 1260 Infinity II HPLC (Figure from Agilent)

Agilent 6495C Triple quadrupole

Agilent 6495C Triple quadrupole (Figure from Agilent)

Thermo Fisher Q Exactive

Thermo Fisher Q Exactive (Figure from Thermo Fisher)

How Our GAG Analysis Works

LC-MS/MS Workflow for GAG Analysis

Research Applications of GAG Profiling

Tumor and Immune Microenvironment

  • Compare GAG composition and sulfation patterns between tumor and matched control tissues or 3D models.
  • Track HS/CS remodeling under targeted therapy, chemotherapy or immunotherapy.
  • Correlate GAG changes with growth factor/chemokine binding, immune cell infiltration and ECM markers.

Endothelial Glycocalyx and Vascular Biology

  • Characterize GAGs shed from the endothelial glycocalyx into plasma or serum in vascular injury or inflammation models.
  • Evaluate how different interventions influence glycocalyx integrity and vascular function.
  • Integrate GAG data with lipidomics or metabolomics to obtain a systems view of vascular stress.

Cartilage, Intervertebral Disc and ECM Remodeling

  • Quantify CS/DS, KS and HA in cartilage, disc tissue and engineered constructs.
  • Monitor GAG loss and structural remodeling during degeneration, mechanical loading or treatment.
  • Relate GAG profiles to biomechanical properties, chondrogenic differentiation and ECM quality.

Metabolic and Genetic Perturbation of GAG Pathways

  • Investigate GAG metabolism in knockout, knock-in or gene-edited models and corresponding cell systems.
  • Assess how changes in glycosyltransferases, sulfotransferases and hydrolases reshape GAG composition.
  • Combine GAG profiling with other omics to map pathway-level effects and potential early biomarkers.

Marine-Derived and Functional Polysaccharides

  • Characterize GAG-rich extracts from marine organisms or animal-derived materials.
  • Compare structural features (chain integrity, sulfation motifs) across species, batches or processing conditions.
  • Link GAG profiles to in vitro or in vivo bioactivity in functional ingredient and biomaterial research.

How to Prepare and Submit Samples for GAG Analysis

Sample type Minimum amount (per sample) Recommended container Storage conditions Shipping notes
Plasma / Serum ≥ 100 µL Low-protein-binding microtube (1.5 mL) Store at −80 °C; avoid repeated freeze–thaw Ship on dry ice; clearly label sample ID and matrix
Urine ≥ 500 µL Polypropylene tube (1.5–2.0 mL) Store at −80 °C Ship on dry ice; avoid preservatives unless discussed
Tissue (fresh / frozen) ≥ 20–30 mg wet weight Cryovial or sealed tube Snap-freeze and store at −80 °C Ship on dry ice; indicate tissue type and species
Tissue (FFPE or sectioned) ≥ 3–5 sections (5–10 µm each) Slide box or sealed container Store at room temperature, dry and protected Contact us in advance for FFPE-specific instructions
Cell pellets ≥ 1 × 10⁶ cells or visible pellet Low-protein-binding microtube Spin down, remove supernatant, store at −80 °C Ship on dry ice; note cell line and culture conditions
Culture supernatant / media ≥ 500 µL Polypropylene tube Store at −80 °C Ship on dry ice; indicate medium and treatment info
ECM / hydrogels / scaffolds ≥ 10–20 mg or one representative piece Sealed tube or sterile container Store at −20 °C or −80 °C (as applicable) Ship frozen; describe material composition and size
Marine / other extracts ≥ 10–20 mg solid or ≥ 500 µL liquid Sealed tube (solid or solution) Store at −20 °C or −80 °C Ship frozen; provide extraction buffer/solvent details

General Recommendations

  • Labeling:Use clear, waterproof labels with sample ID, matrix and group information.
  • Aliquots:If possible, send single-use aliquots to avoid repeated freeze–thaw cycles.
  • Documentation:Include a sample list (Excel or CSV) with sample IDs, groups, species, matrix and any key treatments or time points.

Deliverables: What You Receive from GAG Analysis

Sample and ID summary – A clear sample list with IDs, groups, matrix and any key metadata (Excel/CSV).

Processed quantitative tables – GAG class-level and disaccharide-level values for each sample, with units and basic annotations (Excel/CSV).

Basic group comparison – Mean, SD/SEM, fold-change and simple significance flags (e.g. p-values) for defined groups.

Key overview figures – 1–3 core plots (such as heatmaps, bar charts and/or PCA/cluster overviews) in common image formats.

Method and QC summary – A concise description of sample preparation, LC–MS/MS settings, quantification and QC strategy suitable for methods sections.

Raw data on request – LC–MS(/MS) raw files can be provided if you need to perform additional in-house analyses.

Overlaid GAG disaccharide MRM chromatograms, a linear calibration curve, and sample signal versus LLOQ for LC–MS/MS GAG analysis.

LC–MS/MS analytical performance. (a) Overlaid MRM chromatograms of GAG disaccharides. (b) Linear calibration curve (R2 > 0.99). (c) Sample signal intensity versus LLOQ.

Heatmap displaying hierarchical clustering of GAG profiles and bar charts showing differential abundance of specific disaccharides across groups.

Differential GAG profiling. (a) Hierarchical clustering heatmap of disaccharide abundances. (b) Quantification of key disaccharides across groups (mean ± SEM).

PCA plot, RSD histogram and QC signal trend demonstrating stable and reproducible GAG LC–MS/MS data.

Quality control and stability. (a) PCA score plot showing tight QC clustering. (b) Distribution of feature RSDs. (c) Longitudinal QC signal stability.

Study design diagram, group-wise GAG changes and a correlation plot linking a GAG motif to a biological endpoint.

Integrated disease model study. (a) Study design schematic. (b) Altered HS/CS disaccharide levels across groups. (c) Correlation between GAG motifs and phenotypic markers.

How does your method distinguish between chondroitin sulfate (CS) and dermatan sulfate (DS)?

CS and DS are stereoisomers with identical mass, so we combine enzyme specificity and chromatography. CS- and DS-selective bacterial lyases (e.g., chondroitinase ABC vs. AC/B) generate distinct disaccharide patterns for GlcA- vs. IdoA-containing regions, and an optimized UHPLC method baseline-separates the resulting isobaric disaccharides. This allows DS to be quantified separately, rather than being lumped together with CS.

Does your GAG analysis report chain length or disaccharide composition?

Our LC–MS/MS workflow is a bottom-up disaccharide analysis. GAG chains are highly polydisperse and non-template synthesized, so intact chain mass is often qualitative. By depolymerizing to disaccharides, we provide:

  • Precise composition of non-sulfated vs. mono- and multi-sulfated units
  • Sulfation motifs (e.g., 2-O, 6-O, N-sulfation) relevant to signaling and ECM function
  • Average sulfation level as a proxy for overall charge density

If you specifically need chain size distribution, we can discuss complementary approaches such as GPC/SEC.

Why can't standard untargeted metabolomics replace dedicated GAG LC–MS/MS?

Conventional untargeted metabolomics is not optimized for GAGs. Protein precipitation with high organic solvent tends to co-precipitate long GAG chains, removing them from the analyzable fraction, and standard C18 setups poorly retain highly polar disaccharides. GAG LC–MS/MS uses GAG-preserving preparation and dedicated amide/ion-pairing chromatography, plus targeted MRM transitions, to achieve selective retention, separation and quantitation of GAG disaccharides.

How do you normalize GAG data for tissue samples?

Normalization depends on tissue type and study design, but common strategies include:

  • DNA content – preferred for hypocellular tissues (e.g., cartilage, disc), normalizing to cell number
  • Total protein – suitable for cell lysates and cellular soft tissues
  • Wet or dry weight – useful for large, homogeneous tissue pieces

We can recommend and, if requested, perform DNA or protein measurement in parallel so GAG data are directly comparable across samples and groups.

Can you perform GAG analysis on FFPE tissues?

Yes. Although formalin cross-links proteins, GAG polysaccharide chains are largely preserved. We apply a specialized de-paraffinization and rehydration protocol before enzymatic digestion, enabling GAG disaccharide profiling from FFPE sections. This is especially useful for retrospective biobank studies investigating GAG and sulfation changes in archived tumor or tissue samples.

How do you distinguish heparin from heparan sulfate (HS) in your panel?

Heparin and HS form a biochemical continuum, so we differentiate them based on sulfation density and domain pattern. Heparin is enriched in tri-sulfated disaccharides and iduronic acid–rich, highly sulfated domains, whereas HS typically shows mixed low- and highly sulfated regions. By quantifying specific highly sulfated HS/heparin disaccharides, our panel can indicate whether a sample behaves more like heparin, HS, or a mixture of both.

A comprehensive biochemical characterization of settlement stage leptocephalus larvae of bonefish (Albula vulpes)

Uribe, V., Wills, P. S., Shenker, J. M., et al.

Journal: Journal of Fish Biology

Year: 2021

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/jfb.14846

Multiomics of a rice population identifies genes and genomic regions that bestow low glycemic index and high protein content

Badoni, S., Pasion-Uy, E. A., Kor, S., Kim, S. R., Tiozon Jr, R. N., Misra, G., ... & Sreenivasulu, N.

Journal: Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences

Year: 2024

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2410598121

The Brain Metabolome Is Modified by Obesity in a Sex-Dependent Manner

Norman, J. E., Milenkovic, D., Nuthikattu, S., & Villablanca, A. C.

Journal: International Journal of Molecular Sciences

Year: 2024

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms25063475

Physiological, transcriptomic and metabolomic insights of three extremophyte woody species living in the multi-stress environment of the Atacama Desert

Gajardo, H. A., Morales, M., Larama, G., Luengo-Escobar, A., López, D., Machado, M., ... & Bravo, L. A.

Journal: Planta

Year: 2024

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00425-024-04484-1

Effects of microbial phytase on mucin synthesis, gastric protein hydrolysis, and degradation of phytate along the gastrointestinal tract of growing pigs

Mesina, V. G., Lagos, L. V., Sulabo, R. C., Walk, C. L., & Stein, H. H.

Journal: Journal of Animal Science

Year: 2019

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/jas/sky439

For Research Use Only. Not for use in diagnostic procedures.
inquiry

Get Your Custom Quote

Connect with Creative Proteomics Contact UsContact Us
return-top